Berg & Androphy

Trial Lawyers Prosecuting Qui Tam Cases

Qui Tam Statistics

Since the passage of the 1986 amendments to the FCA, settlements and judgments have totaled in excess of $13.5 billion, including both qui tam and non-qui tam settlements and judgments. The qui tam settlements and judgments alone total $8 billion; whistleblower rewards account for $1.4 billon of this total. The total monetary recoveries and cases filed to date for qui tam actions are outlined in the chart below.

Qui Tam Cases Filed Total Recovered Where DOJ Intervened Total Recovered Where DOJ Declined
1988 60 $355,000 $35,431
1989 95 $15 million $0
1990 82 $40 million $75,000
1991 90 $70 million $69,500
1992 119 $134 million $994,456
1993 132 $171 million $5.9 million
1994 222 $380 million $1.8 million
1995 277 $245 million $1.8 million
1996 363 $125 million $14 million
1997 533 $623 million $7 million
1998 470 $435 million $29.2 million
1999 481 $454 million $40.6 million
2000 367 $1.2 billion $1.8 million
2001 309 $1.2 billion $125.8 million
2002 320 $1.1 billion $29.9 million
2003 334 $1.4 billion $87 million
2004 415 $557 million $9 million
2005 394 $1.1 billion $24.9 million
2006 382 $1.4 billion $16.6 million
TOTALS 5514 $10.6 billion $397 million

For more detailed information on recovery and cases filed under the False Claims Act as well as qui tam and whistleblower rewards, please see the False Claims Act and qui tam statistics accumulated by the Department of Justice.

For more information and case citations, please see “Federal False Claims Act and Qui Tam Litigation,” published by Law Journal Press (2006).

For more information, email quitam@bafirm.com.


Notice

This website is designed to provide general information only. This information is not and should not be construed to be legal advice. The transmission of the information found on this website also does not result in the formation of a lawyer-client relationship.

You should be aware that qui tam claims are subject to a Statute of Limitations. The area of limitations periods is complex. There are also first to file rules, public disclosure bars, original source issues, and varying limitations in pursuing retaliation claims. If you wish to pursue your claims, you should promptly seek the opinion of an attorney regarding the merits of your qui tam claim and the applicable statute of limitations.